With over 100 partition actions currently pending throughout California, Talkov Law’s dedicated partition attorneys have worked with hundreds of co-owners. While some are amenable to a sale or buyout, others are downright unreasonable, though most fall somewhere in between these two extremes. A partition action is usually a last resort once a co-owner has attempted to reason with a co-owner who is unwilling to part with the property.
However, in our experience, filing a complaint for partition of real property is the best way to show your uncooperative co-owner that you are serious about selling the property. Unlike a letter demanding sale of a property, a partition complaint filed with the court cannot simply be thrown away and forgotten about. When that letter is thrown in the trash, there are no consequences to the unreasonable co-owner who refuses to sell the property or buyout the interest of their co-owner.
Many people feel that filing a partition is too harsh and they would rather write a strongly worded letter to their uncooperative co-owner urging the sale of the property to a third party or simply a buyout of their interest. Co-owners who have very positive relationships or have recently spoken about selling the property may find that sending a letter to their co-owner is effective. However, in our attorneys’ experience, issuing a letter to an uncooperative co-owner is unlikely to be an effective remedy if the co-owner has shown certain signs of belligerence as described below. In many cases, filing a partition will be the most effective and fastest way to force the sale of jointly owned property.
There are many factors to take into account when deciding whether to write your co-owner a letter or to contact a partition attorney who can file a complaint for partition. Below are some of the most common factors we see that affect the course of action:
Many co-owners laugh off letters and don’t really believe their co-owner will ever take action. Our attorneys estimate that in about 80% of cases, a letter does nothing but delay the inevitable partition action. A letter can easily be thrown out and ignored with no legal repercussions, but a partition complaint needs to be addressed immediately by a co-owner defendant. The mere fact that you are reading this article indicates that you want to sell a property but have one or more co-owners who are refusing to cooperate, meaning that you may be past the point where a letter would be helpful to you.
The real problem with demand letters is the awkwardness and delays that they create. Notably, demand letters often include some kind of date for action. Defendants may respond by claiming they are working on some kind of buyout, maybe claiming they will refinance after they fix some issue on their credit report or that they will agree to sell after some ambiguous event in their life is over. This creates an awkwardness for the owner demanding the sale to file the partition complaint because effectively you are alleging that the other co-owner will never move forward with their proposed action. In our assessment, once you are already reviewing partition attorney blogs like this one, the coownership relationship has fallen apart such that the best course of action is just to file the partition and include a cover letter with the complaint.
Additionally, the attorney time it takes to draft and analyze a letter to your co-owner is similar to the time it would take him or her to draft and file a partition complaint. If your co-owner simply ignores the letter and you are forced to file a partition anyway, you are now paying for that attorney time as well. We suggest that you to contact a partition attorney who can evaluate your unique circumstances and help you achieve the best possible result in your case, whether that is by drafting a letter or filing a complaint.
Our attorneys have created this sample letter to assist those who feel that a letter is the best course of action. Again, consulting with a partition lawyer can help you decide the best course of action given the facts of your case.
[Defendant]
[Defendant Address]Re: Cooperation with Orderly Sale of Property
Property: [Property Address]
Dear [Defendant],
As you are aware, [Plaintiff] is a co-owner of the real property located at [Property Address] (the “Property”), holding a [ownership interest %] undivided interest as a [joint tenant or tenant in common] along with you. [Plaintiff] is no longer interested in maintaining a co-ownership interest in the Property. Indeed, [Plaintiff] is ready to file a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of [Property County] to bring an end to the co-ownership relationship. However, before filing an action for partition, [Plaintiff] is sending this letter urging you to cooperate in an orderly sale of the Property.
If you choose not to cooperate with the orderly sale of the Property or purchase of the [Plaintiff]’s [ownership interest %] ownership interest in the property, [Plaintiff] will have no choice but to litigate the complaint to partition the Property by sale to a third party upon order of the Court. Should that occur, it is important to understand that [Plaintiff]’s request for partition will cause the Court to order that the Property be sold without regard to whether you agree to do so. California law is clear that, “ordinarily, where realty is owned by cotenants, one cotenant has absolute right to partition, and if partition cannot be made without great prejudice, the court under statute may order a sale.” Priddel v. Shankie (1945) 69 Cal.App. 2d 319.
If court action is required, the costs of sale will be increased by attorney’s fees, court costs, and the employment of a court-appointed referee to list and sell the Property. All these fees will diminish the proceeds available to pay you as a co-owner of the Property; especially in light of the low equity available in the Property.
Further, the court may find that a co-owner who does not cooperate in listing the Property may be liable for all attorney’s fees, court costs and referee fees. This is because “the costs of partition include reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, necessarily incurred by a party for the common benefit . . . .” Cal. Code. Civ. Proc. § 874.020(b). In turn, the cost of partition includes “reasonable attorney’s fees incurred or paid by a party for the common benefit.” Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 874.010(a). In awarding these fees, the court may “make such . . . apportionment as may be equitable.” Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 874.040. A court may find it equitable for the cooperative co-owners to not be burdened with the attorney’s fees, court costs and referee fees that could have been avoided simply by cooperating with an orderly sale of the Property. We hope that you will cooperate in this matter such that this will not be necessary.
The most efficient solution to settle this action is to sell the Property on the open market. When a ready, willing, and able buyer is located, escrow will also request that you sign a deed granting your interest in the Property to the buyer. In exchange, you will receive your fair share proceeds of sale in line with your ownership interest.
Alternatively, [Plaintiff] would be amenable to a buy-out of [his/her] [ownership interest %] ownership interest.
Should you be willing to cooperate in the orderly sale of the Property, then let me know at your earliest convenience and I will arrange for a listing agreement to be drawn up shortly thereafter. If this office does not receive communication from you indicating that you are willing to cooperate with an orderly sale of the Property on the open market, the partition action will continue.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at [Phone Number] or [Email Address]
Sincerely,
[Plaintiff]
If you want to end your co-ownership relationship, but your co-owner won’t agree, a partition action is your only option. With seven, full time partition lawyers, Talkov Law is the #1 partition law firm in California and has handled over 370 partition actions throughout California. Every case has resulted in a sale to either a third party or one of the co-owners. Not a single court has denied our clients the right to partition or declared our client to be a non-owner. Plus, for qualified cases, there is no fee until we settle or win your case!
If you're looking to end your co-ownership dispute, contact California's premier partition action law firm by calling Talkov Law at (844) 4-TALKOV (825568) or sending us a message today.